How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word “intensely clearness” in the context of legislative intent?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Alberta Teachers' Association v. Pembina Hills Regional Division No. 7, 2008 ABQB 87 (CanLII):
Similar statements were made by Cory J. in Rawluk v. Rawluk, 1990 CanLII 152 (SCC), [1990] S.C.J. No. 4, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 70 at para.36 where he noted that “[i]t is trite but true to state that as a general rule a legislature is presumed not to depart from prevailing law “without expressing its intentions to do so with irresistible clearness.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a lack of guilty intent as an excuse for the publishing of an article by a newpaper when the material was prejudicial to the court proceedings? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "including" in legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word “right and true” in the context of a contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted confidential information in the context of the manufacture of a carpet grip? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted section 8 of the Criminal Code in the context of search and seizure? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the Supreme Court of Canada considered “equality before the law” in the context of equal rights legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
