What is the burden of proving a claim of discrimination against a doctor who is not a qualified doctor?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Landau v. Granville Gardens Housing Co-operative and another, 2014 BCHRT 85 (CanLII):
Once a prima facie case has been established at a hearing, the burden shifts to the respondent to justify the conduct or practice. If it cannot be justified, discrimination will be found to have occurred: Bell v. Dr. Sherk and others, 2003 BCHRT 63 (“Bell”).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim of sexual discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving prima facie discrimination by a respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Adorable have the burden of proving its claim against Twin? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that a doctor breached the standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim against the Respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving discrimination against a party in a human rights complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a case of discrimination under the BC Human Rights Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving discrimination against a party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving malice to defeat the defence of qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
