At a hearing, the burden is on a complainant to demonstrate prima facie discrimination by a respondent: a complainant must show that they have a characteristic protected from discrimination; that they have experienced an adverse impact; and that the protected characteristic was a factor in the adverse impact. Once a prima facie case has been established, the burden shifts to the respondent to justify the conduct or practice. If it cannot be justified, discrimination will be found to have occurred: Moore v. British Columbia, 2012 SCC 61, at para. 33. On an application to dismiss filed under s. 27(1)(c), the burden is not on a complainant to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, but rather the burden is on a respondent to show that the complainant has no reasonable prospect of success in doing so: Stonehouse v. Elk Valley Coal (No. 2), 2007 BCHRT 305.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.