Does Adorable have the burden of proving its claim against Twin?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Adorable Enterprises Ltd. v. Twin Phoenix Building Maintenance Inc., 2021 BCCRT 517 (CanLII):
15. Twin says it already paid a portion of the amount claimed. While Adorable has the burden of proving its claims, I find that Twin has the burden to prove what payments it made. See Miller v. Hall, 2020 BCSC 461 at paragraph 50.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim against the Respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim of sexual discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a plaintiff’s claim for medical malpractice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving the elements of a complainant's claim against the Respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim of discrimination against a doctor who is not a qualified doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving prejudice against a cricket association? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the basis for a claim for breach of contract where the applicant does not use the word "honestness" in his statement of claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for meeting the threshold burden of a claim in an action brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a transfer of funds to a different party when the transfer is not a gift? (British Columbia, Canada)
