It would appear that an equitable assignment of all future book debts is effective. It is not too vague: Vide Tailby v. Official Receiver (1888) 13 App Cas 523, 58 LJQB 75. In order for an equitable assignment to be effective there must be proof of the company’s intention to assign the book debts. This cannot be found in the document itself as it is not properly completed. This, at first appearance, would seem to be a paradox in view of the fact that the two signing officers hold a majority of the shares in the company.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.