Can a plaintiff combine a claim for debt and one for damages under the Small Debt Procedure?

The case of Cosgrave v. Duckek, supra, was decided by the same learned judge, and his judgment on the point in issue is as follows: “I held in Paradis v. Horton that a plaintiff cannot combine in a small debt action a claim for debt and one for damages, and, if he has such a claim and wishes to press it, he must bring his whole action under the ordinary procedure; he cannot split it up and bring one action under the small debt procedure and another action under the other procedure; and I set aside the proceedings when he combined both causes of action under the small debt procedure. . . . Proceedings set aside with costs.”