The defendants counterclaimed for damages caused to their engine by these animals. The trial Judge dismissed the counterclaim, I think in so doing he was right. The cattle were lawfully at large, and the defendants had removed their cattle guards, which is equivalent to leaving their land unfenced adjoining a highway, in which case they could not recover, without proof of negligence on part of the plaintiffs: Tillett v. Wood, 10 Q.B.D. 17; 52 L.J.Q.B. 61.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.