The learned trial Judge admitted parole evidence to show that the “lessee’s debt” referred to was this note assumed by the plaintiff, and held that she was liable for it under her contract of lease. It is now objected that this parole evidence to identify the debt referred to was not admissible, but in my opinion it was; and, so far as the evidence goes, there was no other debt in existence at the time that might have been in the minds of the parties: Macdonald v. Longbottom (1860) 1 El. & Bl. 977, 29 L.J.Q.B. 256.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.