I also refer to Kirkpatrick v. Mills (1898) 30 NSR 426, where at p. 428 Ritchie, J. speaking for the court, held that a person reading the libel for the first time in court could give evidence as to whom he thought the libel referred to. In the circumstances of the case at bar and in the light of the authorities there is, in my opinion, ample evidence to justify the jury in holding that the words complained of were aimed at the plaintiff, though his name was not specifically mentioned therein.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.