Moge v. Moge, 1992 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813, discusses the equitable sharing of the financial consequences of relationship breakdown, particularly in long term relationships. The economic consequences of a breakdown in a relationship should not be borne by one party alone or disproportionately. The obligation to assist a spouse with the economic consequences of a breakdown in a relationship should be borne by the other spouse and not the state. The court stated the following, at page 870, concerning long term relationships: As marriage should be regarded as a joint endeavour, the longer the relationship endures, the closer the economic union, the greater will be the presumptive claim to equal standards of living upon its dissolution.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.