The words of Chief Justice McEachern, as he then was, in Thompson v. Floyd (2001), 2001 BCCA 78 (CanLII), 86 B.C.L.R. (3d) 56 (C.A.), are pertinent in this case: In my view this position [that the plaintiff was entitled to 50% of her spouse’s pension accumulated during their 14-year relationship] is correct as the wife had every reason to expect, after having assisted the husband to complete his education, by contributing to the cost of a home for him and his daughters, and in other direct and indirect ways, to share his pension when it became payable. … In this case, the duration of the relationship entitles her to a half share of the pension calculated on the period of their relationship as persons living together as husband and wife.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.