The caution expressed in Boston v. Boston applies in those situations in which one party effectively bought the pension as a capital asset by allocating compensating assets to the other party. By foregoing otherwise valid claims for other assets in favour of the pension, one spouse effectively “buys” the pension from the other spouse. Is this such a case? In my view it is not.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.