21 In Kennedy v. Kennedy (1994), 98 B.C.L.R. (2d) 287 (S.C.), Newbury J. (as she then was) considered a situation where she found that the main "economic consequence" of the marriage was not the impact of the marriage on earning capacity, but rather the fact that the wife would, in future, have the greatest part of the day-to-day child rearing responsibilities. She refused to order spousal maintenance but held that, inter alia, the wife's "... need to become economically independent and to achieve for herself and her children a standard of living as close as possible to the standard that prevailed during the marriage, ..." persuaded her that an equal division of family assets would be unfair (p. 302).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.