In this case the drivers of the two cars saw each other. The driver of the truck had only driven it two blocks. Admittedly he was trying to see how slowly the truck would go while in high gear. He admits further that he only looked to his right on the one occasion. It is suggested that he was not required to look again and that Herd v. John Erzinger Ltd. 1938 CanLII 149 (SK CA), [1938] 1 WWR 725, is authority for this statement. That case was decided upon its own particular facts as found by the trial Judge. The intersection was very icy and the speed of the defendant’s truck was sufficient to almost demolish the plaintiff’s truck and injure him most seriously. Further, the driver of the defendant’s truck in that case did not keep a proper lookout as found by the trial Judge. There is no similarity between the two cases.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.