In Fenn v. Miller [1902] 1 Q.B. 788, at p. 793, 69 L.J.Q.B. 439, Collins, L.J., said: I draw a distinction between being engaged in a business which does not involve the necessity of physical contiguity to the factory, and the being actually in physical contiguity to the factory, by which I mean being within such area as a jury might say was reasonably necessary for the purposes of the business carried on in the factory; in the one case the jury would be entitled to say that the employment was about the factory; in the other they would not be so entitled.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.