It seems to me that the doctrine of frustration is applicable and relevant when it is alleged in a case, such as the one at bar, that a change of circumstances after the formation of the contract renders it physically or commercially impossible to fulfil the contract The principle of an implied condition seems to be that, in contracts in which the performance depends on the continued existence of a given person or thing, a condition is implied that the impossibility of performance arising from the perishing of the person or thing shall excuse the performance: vide Blackburn J. in Taylor v. Caldwell (1863), 3 B. & S. 826 at 833, 122 E.R. 309.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.