Wetmore, J. in Larry v. Baker, supra, at p. 148, appears to express an opinion that” a contract made by a person before he is appointed administrator may be unilateral, that is, it may be enforced by one party to it for the benefit of the estate after he takes out administration but that it cannot be enforced by the other party to it as against the estate. He concluded so because he was unable to find any case in which the doctrine of relation back had been enforced against the estate. Here I must point out with respect that the test should be not whether the litigation is in the interest of the estate but whether the contract was at the time it was entered into in the interest of the estate. It could not be in the interest of an estate to lose a law suit and the test so applied would be most unjust.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.