The defendant argues courts have consistently rejected claims by regulated entities that a regulator owes a duty to consider the economic impact of decisions when taking regulatory action and if this case does fall into a category, it is a category of immunity, relying on Attis v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2008 ONCA 660, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused [2008] S.C.C.A. No. 491.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.