Although the two actions share some chronology and some of the same witnesses, the focus of the two claims as disclosed by the pleadings, is really quite different. I am not as a result able to say that the first tests set out in Merritt v. Imasco Enterprises Inc., [1992] B.C.J. No. 160, 2 C.P.C. (3d) 275 has been met in that I cannot say that the parties respective disputes have sufficient in common to justify a common trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.