The Defendant argued that to find him liable would be to impose a strict or absolute standard of liability upon him. No such standard applies, even in cases involving child pedestrians, as stated by Yanosik, J. in Weaver v. Buckle (1982), 35 A.R. 97 at 111: “... I appreciate that the standards applicable are those of reasonable care and prudence in the circumstances, and not standards of perfection, and that the law must not be stretched in cases of this kind, where natural sympathies are with the child, so as to create a virtual insurance against injuries to children ...”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.