How have courts interpreted the proviso of an accident policy in respect of death by accident or violence?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Koch v. Empire Life Insurance Company, 1981 CanLII 1207 (AB QB):

In Reynolds v. Accidental Ins. Co. (1870), 22 L.T. 820, the policy contained a proviso that no claim should be payable under the policy in respect of death by accident or violence, unless such death should be occasioned by some "external and material cause operating upon the person of the said insured" [p. 820]. The facts were that the insured, while in a pool about one foot deep, suddenly became insensible from some unexplained internal cause and fell into the water face downwards. The cause of death was suffocation by water. The plaintiff claim was successful. Willes J. at p. 821 held: "In this case the death resulted from the action of the water on the lungs and from the consequent interference with respiration … the fact of … falling in the water from sudden insensibility was an accident".

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted the proviso in an accident insurance policy? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case where the victim is not dead but still exists, is there any case law that supports the presumption that the accident victim’s death is not an accident? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the definition of a personal injury policy in the context of personal injury claims? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the phrase “care, custody or control” in the context of an insurance policy? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a fire insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.