In Britney v. Britney, supra, the respondent's armed forces pension was divided as matrimonial property. The respondent did not pay as required. The pension payments were then regarded by the court as maintenance so that they could be collected by way of garnishment. There may be some problems with treating pension payments as maintenance. If a petitioner dies before the respondent, her estate will probably not be able to collect the balance of the petitioner's matrimonial property entitlements because maintenance terminates on the death of the recipient. The petitioner or her estate is entitled to the monthly pension payments as long as they are received by the respondent. The court should not have to resort to a fiction so as to enable the petitioner to collect her lawful share of the respondent's pension.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.