This is evident from the words of Finch J.A. (as he then was) in A.L. v. D.K. (2000), 2000 BCCA 455 (CanLII), 9 R.F.L. (5th) 341 (B.C.C.A.) at para. 13, where he refers to Mr. Justice Hinds’ (as he then was) decision in Kamimura v. Squibb (1988), 1987 CanLII 2965 (BC SC), 13 R.F.L. (3d) 31 (B.C.S.C.) and states the following: Where no prior order for permanent custody has been made, a court’s order for custody must be based on a full and balanced consideration of all factors touching on the best interests of the child. An agreement concerning custody between contending parties is an important factor to take into consideration, but is only one factor.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.