The reduction of beneficial contact between the child and the access parent does not always dictate a change in custody or an order which restricts moving the child. If the child’s needs are likely to be best served by remaining with the custodial parent, and this consideration offsets the loss or reduction with the access parent, then the judge should not vary custody and permit the move. (See also Mai v. Schumann, 2013 BCCA 365 at para. 62).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.