In P.E.P v. D.W.P. at para. 10 Macaulay J. states: Ordering costs against an unsuccessful parent in a child custody case focused on the effect of a parental move, as was the case both here and in Morrison, absent egregious conduct during the course of the litigation, does not serve the best interests of the child because it will have a chilling effect on any parent who cannot afford the risk. The interests of children are not served if capable parents are deterred from seeking custody for economic reasons. In my view, the question of costs in child custody cases is not governed by Gold.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.