The prosecution could not have called the wife as a witness against her husband in the case at bar, and I do not think it had any right to introduce the evidence of the wife given in the examination in a civil action, to be used against the husband, the accused. It was doing indirectly what it would not be allowed to do directly. (Apart from the evidence being that of a wife, see Allen v. Reg., 1911 CanLII 52 (SCC), 44 S.C.R. 331, 18 C.C.C. 1).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.