Does a plea of guilty constitute an estoppel against the prosecution from requiring the prosecution to adduce evidence?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Binns, 1941 CanLII 127 (SK QB):

Rex v. Brook seems clear authority for the appellant’s right to object, even after a plea of guilty, to the power to pass the regulations under which he was punished. The cases all decide that a plea of guilty acts as an estoppel against the accused from requiring the prosecution to adduce evidence.

Other Questions


Does s. 471 of the Criminal Code of Canada require that evidence be taken in accordance with the provisions of Part XV relating to preliminary inquiries? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the prosecution have any right to introduce evidence of a wife as a witness against her husband in a civil action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for allowing evidence to be adduce at the Court of Appeal in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a request for production of evidence of past misconduct constitute the offence of collusion? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an affidavit filed in breach of the requirements of the Rules of Civil Procedure requiring strict compliance? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances can a director of public Prosecutions be prosecuted for gross misconduct? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When will an application to adduce fresh evidence be dismissed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a non-parental third party like Mr. E.E.S seeks access to the child, what is the standard of evidence required by the court to determine that access is not appropriate? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of malicious prosecution? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.