Can a request for production of evidence of past misconduct constitute the offence of collusion?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Parry v. Parry, 1926 CanLII 123 (SK CA):

In Laidler v. Laidler (1920) 90 L.J.P. 28, 123 L.T. 208, 36 T.L.R. 510, it was held, according to the headnote, that: A request by a proposed petitioner for production by the proposed respondent of evidence of past acts of misconduct does not, apart from any arrangement as to the conduct of the proposed proceedings, constitute the offence of collusion.

Other Questions


Does a party have a right to revert to the facts of an offence committed before the date of the offence when the offence was forgiven? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any ground on which the summons issued pursuant to the information respecting the May, 1961 offence relating to the offence respecting the date of the offence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a collusive bargain was not collusive? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a plea of guilty constitute an estoppel against the prosecution from requiring the prosecution to adduce evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If an information can only be laid for one offence, can a person only be convicted of one offence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What constitutes wilful and wanton misconduct? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a Traffic Safety Court Justice of the Peace (JPS) have any authority or authority to reject or reject the evidence presented by the defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances can a director of public Prosecutions be prosecuted for gross misconduct? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the trial judge err in allowing the respondent to introduce parol evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.