In the context of treaty litigation and s. 35, it is open to the court to take a robust common sense approach to cause and contribution. In Sopinka J.’s unanimous decision in Snell v. Farrell, 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, he noted at 327: If I were convinced that defendants who have a substantial connection to the injury were escaping liability because plaintiffs cannot prove causation under currently applied principles, I would not hesitate to adopt one of these alternatives.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.