While this means that a legally compensable mental injury must be more than mere psychological upset, such a finding need not rest, in whole or in part, on the plaintiff proving a recognized psychiatric illness. Expert evidence can assist in determining whether or not a mental injury has been established, but where a psychiatric diagnosis is unavailable, it remains open to a trier of fact to find, on other evidence adduced by a plaintiff, that she has proven on a balance of probabilities the occurrence of mental injury: Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28 at paras. 35-38.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.