What is the procedure in which there have been no examinations for discoveries and no cross-examination on the affidavits?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ross River Dena Council v Yukon (Government of), 2015 YKSC 45 (CanLII):
In the case at bar, there were no examination for discoveries and no cross-examination on the affidavits filed. In other words, it has been a “just, speedy and inexpensive determination” of the proceeding on its merits. The procedure has been expeditious being heard in two days rather than days or weeks of discovery and oral evidence at trial. It is the same procedure as used in RRDC #1 and Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal opinion in an affidavit, is it permissible to include personal opinions in the affidavit? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for assessing evidence that may or may not support a claim of lien? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for determining whether an unequal division of family assets is appropriate? (Yukon, Canada)
Is a husband who has failed to fully disclose his income and business income a subject to a special costs order? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a court to grant interim custody to a father who has been granted interim custody of his children by a judge? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the impact of the "historic trade-off" emphasized by defendants’ counsel? (Yukon, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to full indemnity and special costs as indemnity? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the factors that a trial judge should consider when deciding on the question of admissibility? (Yukon, Canada)
How has custody of a child been determined in a separation case? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the meaning of what is called “Contract A”? (Yukon, Canada)
