What is the proper procedure for assessing evidence that may or may not support a claim of lien?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Golden Hill v. Ross Mining Limited and Norman Ross, 2009 YKSC 80 (CanLII):
Despite the procedure followed in Pitt v. Holt, it is not appropriate to be assessing the evidence that may or may not support the claim of lien. That can only be considered pursuant to a Rule 19 summary trial or a full hearing on the Petition.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the principle of "reasonable diligence" in assessing the facts of a claim? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for determining whether an unequal division of family assets is appropriate? (Yukon, Canada)
When one of two joint owners of a family home has exclusive possession of the home, can the other joint owner who lives outside the family home claim occupation rent? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for consideration of past consideration in a claim for damages? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the principles applied by the courts in assessing the credibility of the accused? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the case law on admitting new evidence in a criminal appeal? (Yukon, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the concept of conspiracy in a claim of wrongful dismissal? (Yukon, Canada)
How has the court considered the potential prejudicial effect of excluding or excluding evidence of abuse in a sexual assault case? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the proper legal test? (Yukon, Canada)
Can misleading information be saved if it is corrected in evidence? (Yukon, Canada)
