[67] In Davis v. Crawford the Court of Appeal felt that it was apparent that the trial judge concluded that there was a real risk that the husband would not pay periodic support and that this factor justified a lump sum award. In addition, the fact that the husband did not make proper disclosure was a consideration in ordering a lump sum, thereby providing a clean break. Otherwise the wife would face unending litigation in order to maintain her entitlement to spousal support. The court upheld the decision of the trial judge.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.