A trial judge’s award of spousal support will not be interfered with lightly by a reviewing court. Deference to such awards promotes finality in family law litigation and recognizes the importance of the appreciation of the facts by the trial judge. However, appellate intervention is appropriate where there is an error in principle, a significant misapprehension of the evidence, or the award is clearly wrong: Hickey v. Hickey, 1999 CanLII 691 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518, at para. 11. For the reasons that follow, I agree that the trial judge’s determination of the Wife’s annual income for support purposes is unsustainable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.