What is the test for liability for damage caused by a defect in the attachment of the pick-up tube?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. Marshall, 1998 ABQB 983 (CanLII):

The trial judge based his decision on Donoghue v. Stevenson, holding that it had been proven that the flaw in the attachment of the pick-up tube was either caused at the time of manufacture or during a repair under warranty and that in either case, the appellant was liable for the damage to the engine.

Other Questions


What is the legal test for damages for damage caused by a breach of the law by a party to a property? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident where there may be multiple causes of damage or injury, can a defendant escape full liability? (Alberta, Canada)
Is some damage sufficient for a cause of action to arise and a limitation period to start run? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between the categories of strict liability and reasonable care in a strict liability offence? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a cause of action for damages arising from the date of time running out? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an expert testify that the disclosure of damage to a vehicle causes the vehicle's value to decline? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an occupier of a building is liable for damage caused to a plaintiff's property by an electrical shock? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances can a plaintiff sue a manufacturer or designer of a barbecue for damages caused by a gas leak close to one of the burners? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a defect in design a latent defect in the machinery covered by an all-risk policy? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts apportioned the 80-20 split between liability and apportionment of liability in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.