If the purported “acceptance” is not unequivocal, but rather conditional, the communication amounts to a counter-offer, to which the original offeror may respond. In North Vancouver v. Tracey (1903), 1903 CanLII 26 (SCC), 34 S.C.R. 132, it was held that there was no contract where an offer to buy land at a price that would include a payment of the tax arrears and costs was purportedly accepted by the vendor at a price that included the payment of tax arrears, costs, and interest. According to the court, the vendor’s response amounted to a counter-offer.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.