Should she have double or increased costs because of the offer made before judgment? In my opinion, she should. The rule may in fact be subject to some criticism: (See Marshall v. Butt, (supra).) It is nonetheless the rule and, in my opinion, it is a salutary one and should not be avoided in family law matters. The sanction for failing to accept a good offer should be available, and it is helpful in avoiding useless or protracted litigation. I see no reason to depart from the rule in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.