What is the current state of the law in Canada on the basis of the adjudicator’s reasoning?

The Court of Appeal made it clear that “judges should read the reasons of the adjudicator as a whole in order to assess whether the reasoning is…flawed [and] renders the decision unreasonable despite the fact there is some evidence to support a conclusion that the decision falls within a range of acceptable outcomes”: see Kenyon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 485 at paras. 53-55. In this case, the flaw in the Adjudicator’s reasoning was central to their conclusion on the point of what evidence could be considered.