In Jensen v. MacGregor et al, 1992 CanLii 2167, Madam Justice Sinclair Prowse considered an application to strike pleadings in the context of a claim that legal advice given to and followed by one estranged spouse damaged the other estranged spouse and their children. At pages 3 and 4 of the decision she stated: With respect to the application pursuant to Rule 19(24)(a) to succeed the defendants must establish that the pleadings presently (and even if amended) , absolutely beyond doubt, do not disclose a plausible argument to be heard at trial [citations omitted]; that the facts as pleaded or as amended disclose no cause of action; and that the pleadings disclose no arguable issue and therefore it is plain and obvious that the claim cannot succeed. Moreover, if the case involves an investigation of a serious question of law or questions of general importance or if the facts are to be known before the rights are definitely decided, this Rule ought not to be applied.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.