Does the decision not to permit further amendments before striking pleadings before striking the pleadings is discretionary?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gosal v. Gill, 2019 BCCA 147 (CanLII):
The decision not to permit further amendments before striking the pleadings was clearly discretionary in nature, in the sense that term is described by Newbury J.A. in Kish v. Sobchak Estate, 2016 BCCA 65.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for an application to amend a pleading to amend the pleadings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is just and convenient to amend the pleadings of a plaintiff's application to amend to include a third piece of property and a water lease? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a lack of precision in a pleading sufficient to strike the pleading? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is Esquimalt permitted to amend its pleadings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an amended pleading be amended during trial and after its conclusion of evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an application to amend the pleadings before the application to strike the claim is heard? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 215.5(7) of the BCSC prohibit the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles from extending the decision date of a decision until after the date of the decision has been determined? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any need to amend or amend the pleadings of defendants in nuisance or trespass cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge be able to substitute his or her own decision on a rehearing of a Master's decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a Residential Tenancy Branch arbitrator's decision not to interfere with the decision of an arbitrator? (British Columbia, Canada)
