In the alternative, if the decision is one of mixed fact and law, the Master was clearly wrong, and as the interlocutory ruling raises questions vital to the final issue of the case, a rehearing in which the judge appealed to may substitute his own discretion for that of the master is appropriate (Stoicevski v. Casement, 1983 CanLII 1679 (Ont. CA).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.