I see no reason for this consequence to continue. The fact that the appeal took the form of a rehearing is no reason in my view to deprive the plaintiff of his costs of both hearings. I note that this was the order in Bott v. Sorley, [1998] B.C.J. No. 2023, where, similarly, after a rehearing an appeal from a Master was allowed and the successful party given the costs of both hearings.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.