42. The case of R v. Andrews (ABCA) shows that there must be proof, in a criminal court, of impairment of the ability to drive, with conduct that deviates from normal behavior. Even if the Appellant failed to signal a lane change or briefly drift close to another vehicle – which the Appellant did not – that would not diverge from normal driving. That happens with perfectly sober drivers.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.