What is the test for "least impairing" legislation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Morrow v. Zhang, 2008 ABQB 98 (CanLII):

In Baier v. Alberta, 2007 SCC 31, Fish J. elaborated, at para. 120: Legislatures are not bound to adopt the “least impairing” means of furthering pressing and substantial objectives. They cannot, however, interfere with or limit constitutionally protected rights or freedoms in a manner that plainly overshoots the mark. Although these observations were made in the context of a dissenting opinion, there was no need for the majority to comment on s. 1, as it found that there was no Charter violation.

Other Questions


Is there a difference between legislation which treats one section of the population more harshly than all others by reason of race and legislation providing additional benefits to one class of women? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any evidence that HCBI has shown there is at least at least a hint of potential compromise or negotiation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between human rights legislation and the law of tort? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for reasonable suspicion of impaired driving? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for impairment of the ability to drive? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of community of interest in municipal legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for proper maintenance and support pursuant to family relief legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the Supreme Court of Canada considered “equality before the law” in the context of equal rights legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts in Trinidad and Tobago interpreted freedom of association provisions in trade union legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a Defendant ask for all facts you know about impairment in a Statement of Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.