In Baier v. Alberta, 2007 SCC 31, Fish J. elaborated, at para. 120: Legislatures are not bound to adopt the “least impairing” means of furthering pressing and substantial objectives. They cannot, however, interfere with or limit constitutionally protected rights or freedoms in a manner that plainly overshoots the mark. Although these observations were made in the context of a dissenting opinion, there was no need for the majority to comment on s. 1, as it found that there was no Charter violation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.