This was followed in Nicholl v. Wheeler, 17 Q.B.D. 101, on appeal in this case at p. 319, Cotton, L.J. said: A party who has made an affidavit of documents cannot be ordered to make a further affidavit unless, either upon the face of the affidavit itself, or of the documents referred to in it, or in his pleading, there is something, which affords a presumption that he has in his possession other relevant documents besides those the possession of which he has admitted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.