In that case the land was a homestead at the time of action and all other times material. In that case the husband and wife were parties to the action opposing the making of a declaration that a certain document was a charge on the homestead. The trial judge found the document null and void “under the circumstances”. In my view, that case is not at odds with the line of cases culminating in Friess v. Imperial Oil Ltd., supra, or the proposition therein [at p. 151] that it is “As against a non-consenting wife [that] every . . . instrument intended to convey any interest in a homestead . . . is invalid and void”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.