To illustrate the point that a defendant who is being represented by the fund is treated differently than a regular defendant, consider the decision of Master Dash in Larkman Estate v. Briginshaw, [2007] O.J. No. 1656, 157 A.C.W.S. (3d) 71 (S.C.J.). There, the fund had assumed carriage of the defence for an uninsured defendant. When the named defendant could not be located and produced for an examination for discovery, the [page266] plaintiffs moved to strike the statement of defence, and the defendant's alleged insurer moved to strike the third party claim.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.