We will deal first with the appellants’ contention that it is an error in principle to award a premium when a defendant has a meritorious defence. Substantial indemnity costs are awarded in two different types of circumstances. The first is where the losing party has engaged in reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous behaviour: Young v. Young, 1993 CanLII 34 (SCC), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3. The second is triggered by operation of rule 49.10. In the second situation, it is not misconduct that leads to a substantial indemnity costs award but, rather, the operation of an offer to settle under rule 49.10.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.