I have held, previously, that a ratio of 60% between substantial-indemnity costs and partial-indemnity costs is “a typical ratio . . . and . . . it would be unusual for the percentage to be higher or much lower”: see Suprun v. Bryla, [2007] O.J. No. 5071 (S.C.J.) at para. 48. I continue to adhere to that general view, except in rule-76 cases where a lower ratio (sometimes much lower) frequently is necessary in order to give effect to the purpose of the rule. hourly rates of plaintiff’s counsel
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.