What is the test for making a decision in favour of one of the accepted school of thought over another?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from O’Connor v Wambera, 2018 BCSC 886 (CanLII):
One cannot retrospectively prefer one accepted school of thought over another. In Fairley v. Waterman, et al, 2002 BCSC 10 at paras. 11 and 42, Mr. Justice Wong stated that:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is it acceptable that a physician adhered to an accepted school of thought? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a Minister made an unreasonable or unjust decision in making a decision not to seek assurances that the likely penalty would not make the surrender unjust or oppressive? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 215.5(7) of the BCSC prohibit the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles from extending the decision date of a decision until after the date of the decision has been determined? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a decision of a master have authority to make decisions of the master? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the context of the BC Supreme Court of Canada's decision making decisions on same sex discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to make a rational decision regarding their own care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it in the public interest for a school to accept an event that has been deemed unenforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge be able to substitute his or her own decision on a rehearing of a Master's decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a third party resident of another province resident in another province be ordered to produce his or her records to a litigant? (British Columbia, Canada)
